Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Matzko's avatar

The former, aspiring Byzantinist in me shudders at any call to make politics and sports more similar or entangled. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demes_in_the_Byzantine_Empire

Bayesian's avatar

I would offer a friendly amendment - politics shouldn't be more like *entertainment*, of which high attendance/viewing/profile sports is a distinct subset**. Granted sports has the advantage for our primate minds of having clearly delineated winners and losers, something largely missing from other entertainment forms. There's obviously a long history of entertainment aspects to politics (not *just* team and fandom building exercises), but I suspect the overlap has greatly increased in the last few decades.

I *suspect* that the fact that Presidential political systems conflate the dignified and efficient (H/T Bagehot) parts of government more than Parliamentary systems plays some role there too (though looking at e.g. the UK or Canada shows creep of the Bagehottian :) dignified role onto the PM).

Obviously consider me to have made a nod toward "to understand Trump, understand 'professional' wrestling".

** It always struck me as a category error that in the newspaper, back when there were such things, sports and entertainment had separate sections; my local fishwrap, the LA Times, still has a dedicated sports section but now only has a dedicated entertainment section in the Sunday edition. Then again I'm one of those weird, bordering on autistic, people who really doesn't "get" fandom as a social/psychological phenomenon, so it's unsurprising that I wouldn't be able to create a realistic theory of mind that would cover sports fandom.

No posts

Ready for more?